To frenzied vax-pushers I know, I’ve asked a simple question: “If the childhood vaccine schedule (in the USA) is safe and effective then why do the manufacturers require liability protection?” They always shoot back about how the “vaccine court” is easier to win a case and is better for the scant number of actual vaccine-injured people. These defenders are in obvious denial about how checks and balances actually work.
The perps are also hoping that we won't notice that all of this is illegal and that only they themselves were involved in the criminal agreements forming evidence of their crimes.
The people of the world - the intended, unknowing victims - were never even made party to what amounts to our own dispossession.
Under what sane or just law can criminal agreements be made among those claiming that their victims must be 'legally' bound by the various criminals illegal personal con games and private agreements, made between their criminal selves, that they will own all of us, and that we will have nothing?
“Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known”
This came out AFTER the FDA grandfathered the vax in granting permission to Pfizer to market their death vax. Obviously Pfizer knew and the FDA knew, of course Fauci and Gates knew as well - along with the bioweapon lab in China that the product was not tested but it did have a goal - to kill or maim as many citizens of the world as possible by mandating/coercing/threatening the death vax injection. and paying doctors/medical staff for each vax forced successfully.
The various publics of the world, not having even been made party to such secretive and privately made illegal agreements, cannot be held liable for any negative aspects of any such attempted con game carried out by criminal conspirators gaining access to their public offices under false pretences.
In no democracy can public servants pretend to have any (non-existent) ability to hand over what belongs to others - including shared Commons belonging to all, such as the threatened country and democracy.
Democracy literally meaning self-rule of/by/for the people, with all equal under law, NOT an election of transient fellow-citizen 'owners' feeling entitled to do as they please even to disposing of the country and all within to hostile foreign self-interests intent upon the people's dispossession..
Nor is illegal human rights abuse within ANYONE's purview (should the people be perceived as/made vulnerable to such betrayal and attack by stratagem/propaganda/force) so as to attempt to con the public into believing that they can have their inherent and *inalienable* rights impossibly removed simply by an illegal stroke of a criminal's pen. for the public themselves to be purportedly 'legally and bindingly' - under lawlessness - made into disposable chattels at the mercy of the merciless.
Those willingly party to these illegal contracts have merely proven themselves to be traitors not only to their countries and people, but to humanity and to all life, and only they are liable for their own crimes.
To frenzied vax-pushers I know, I’ve asked a simple question: “If the childhood vaccine schedule (in the USA) is safe and effective then why do the manufacturers require liability protection?” They always shoot back about how the “vaccine court” is easier to win a case and is better for the scant number of actual vaccine-injured people. These defenders are in obvious denial about how checks and balances actually work.
And the powers that shouldn't be in SA are all being rewarded handsomely for this.
And we all know that those horrors in charge of the UK are just the same. Fascism in plain sight.
Good question. Why did they sign us all up to those conditions? These are people without a conscience.
The perps are also hoping that we won't notice that all of this is illegal and that only they themselves were involved in the criminal agreements forming evidence of their crimes.
The people of the world - the intended, unknowing victims - were never even made party to what amounts to our own dispossession.
Under what sane or just law can criminal agreements be made among those claiming that their victims must be 'legally' bound by the various criminals illegal personal con games and private agreements, made between their criminal selves, that they will own all of us, and that we will have nothing?
“Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known”
This came out AFTER the FDA grandfathered the vax in granting permission to Pfizer to market their death vax. Obviously Pfizer knew and the FDA knew, of course Fauci and Gates knew as well - along with the bioweapon lab in China that the product was not tested but it did have a goal - to kill or maim as many citizens of the world as possible by mandating/coercing/threatening the death vax injection. and paying doctors/medical staff for each vax forced successfully.
Got it!
The various publics of the world, not having even been made party to such secretive and privately made illegal agreements, cannot be held liable for any negative aspects of any such attempted con game carried out by criminal conspirators gaining access to their public offices under false pretences.
In no democracy can public servants pretend to have any (non-existent) ability to hand over what belongs to others - including shared Commons belonging to all, such as the threatened country and democracy.
Democracy literally meaning self-rule of/by/for the people, with all equal under law, NOT an election of transient fellow-citizen 'owners' feeling entitled to do as they please even to disposing of the country and all within to hostile foreign self-interests intent upon the people's dispossession..
Nor is illegal human rights abuse within ANYONE's purview (should the people be perceived as/made vulnerable to such betrayal and attack by stratagem/propaganda/force) so as to attempt to con the public into believing that they can have their inherent and *inalienable* rights impossibly removed simply by an illegal stroke of a criminal's pen. for the public themselves to be purportedly 'legally and bindingly' - under lawlessness - made into disposable chattels at the mercy of the merciless.
Those willingly party to these illegal contracts have merely proven themselves to be traitors not only to their countries and people, but to humanity and to all life, and only they are liable for their own crimes.