Decades of California Cloud Seeding: Real Man Made Climate Change!
When big businesses and government agencies collude to manipulate nature and the natural order of the planet with no accountability, the potential consequences are devastation
Even though it has been going on for close to 70 years most people don’t believe that cloud seeding is real yet they believe a natural scapegoat gas like CO2 is a pollutant and that’s what we should be focusing on.
While this Substack has primarily focused on big businesses and government agencies colluding to manipulate people, health, and even the genetics that go into our bodies, there is a common thread to this piece: There is far too much power in private business and its influence and control over public services, resources, and health. The current system is out of control with respect to the power held by the current oligarchs.
Chat GPT Conclusion: The ongoing use of Cloud Seeding in California (since the 1950's), a region known for its potential for Wild Fires, is "Playing with Fire"?
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
Concluding Question to ChatGPT (Full Conversation can be read/downloaded below)
Since you have stated that
1) cloud seeding has been conducted in California since the 1950s
2) seeding accelerates the release of moisture in clouds, potentially reducing the amount of moisture available for other areas
3) There is no coordinated approach to when and who cloud seeds
4) There is limited research (if any) conducted specifically on the potential impact of cloud seeding on wildfire risks due to deprived rainfall in non-commercial areas.
5) There is no way to accurately determine what areas would have received precipitation but for the cloud seeding operation
6) There is no direct financial incentives in place to consider the impact on wildfires by those conducting cloud seeding on a regular basis
7) The primary Financial Incentive for private contractors (at the moment) is to maximize the amount of cloud seeding performed to generate income from these services
In a one word answer, is it fair to say that with respect to Wild Fires, the ongoing use of Cloud Seeding in California, a region known for its potential for Wild Fires, is
"Playing with Fire"?
ChatGPT
Yes.
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
In Line with Bernie’s end of 2024 warning:
When big businesses and government agencies collude to manipulate nature and the natural order of the planet with no accountability, the potential consequences are devastation.
ChatGPT 40 mini Conversation on California Cloud Seeding Manipulation
Conversation held while not logged in with any particular username or profile January 09th (US Date) 2025 - 11 Questions:
Key Questions 6 though 11:
Question 1)
Are there weather control measures or tests being carried out in California?
ChatGPT said:
It seems like I can’t do more browsing right now. Please try again later.
Question 2)
Is the above an off bounds question?
ChatGPT said:
No, your question about weather control measures or tests is not off-limits. I can help you explore topics related to weather modification, like cloud seeding or research programs, which are sometimes conducted in different regions, including California.
While such programs can be controversial, they often aim to influence precipitation patterns, such as increasing rainfall during droughts. However, they are typically subject to regulation and oversight by authorities.
If you're looking for specific information on current weather modification efforts or tests, feel free to ask again, and I'll do my best to provide insights!
Question 3)
I am asking if there are weather control measures or tests being carried out in California. If you cannot answer about the immediate present, can you answer with respect to the past and specifically about California ,without watering it down with examples elsewhere?
ChatGPT said:
Yes, California has been involved in weather modification programs in the past, especially in the form of cloud seeding. Cloud seeding is a technique aimed at enhancing precipitation, typically by dispersing substances such as silver iodide or sodium chloride into clouds to encourage the formation of rain or snow. These measures are usually intended to increase water supplies, particularly in times of drought.
In California, cloud seeding has been conducted since the 1950s. Some notable examples include:
The California State Cloud Seeding Program: This program was launched in the 1950s with the goal of increasing rainfall over key water basins, particularly in areas of the Sierra Nevada mountains. The program was implemented during droughts to help boost the state's water resources. Over the years, the California Department of Water Resources has carried out cloud seeding operations, especially in winter months when storms occur.
The San Joaquin Valley: Cloud seeding has also been used in the San Joaquin Valley, which is another area prone to water scarcity. The technique has been used here in an attempt to enhance precipitation over agricultural areas, improving water availability.
Private and Municipal Programs: In addition to state-level programs, some local authorities and private entities in California have also conducted cloud seeding to manage water resources more effectively. For instance, water districts may implement such programs to help secure water supplies for large populations and agricultural demands.
While cloud seeding has been used for decades, it remains controversial and has generated debate over its efficacy and potential environmental impacts. Research is ongoing to assess whether cloud seeding truly leads to significant increases in rainfall and how it affects ecosystems.
To sum it up, California has indeed conducted weather control tests in the form of cloud seeding, particularly for water resource management, and these efforts have been part of the state's history of addressing drought and water scarcity.
Question 4)
Does it affect wind patterns?
ChatGPT said:
Cloud seeding, the most common weather modification technique used in California, is generally designed to influence precipitation rather than wind patterns. The goal is to encourage clouds to release moisture as rain or snow. However, cloud seeding typically does not directly affect wind patterns in a significant or lasting way. Here's why:
Targeted Impact on Cloud Formation: Cloud seeding works by introducing substances like silver iodide or sodium chloride into clouds. These particles serve as nuclei around which water vapor condenses, eventually leading to precipitation. This process happens within the cloud and typically doesn't involve the broader atmospheric conditions that drive wind patterns.
Localized Effects: The effects of cloud seeding are usually localized, limited to the cloud being seeded. The changes to the cloud's internal structure (such as the formation of droplets or ice crystals) don't have enough of a large-scale atmospheric effect to alter wind currents. Wind is primarily influenced by large-scale factors like temperature differences, atmospheric pressure, and the rotation of the Earth (Coriolis effect).
Wind Patterns and Larger-Scale Weather: Wind patterns are more affected by broader atmospheric processes, including temperature gradients, jet streams, and high/low pressure systems. While cloud seeding might impact precipitation, it doesn't significantly alter these larger meteorological processes that govern wind.
That being said, there could be very minor secondary effects. For example, if cloud seeding leads to heavier precipitation in a particular area, it might slightly modify local conditions like temperature and humidity, which could have a brief and localized impact on wind near the ground. However, these changes would generally be short-lived and not large enough to have a lasting effect on regional or global wind patterns.
In short, while cloud seeding can influence weather in terms of precipitation, it does not significantly affect wind patterns on a broad scale. The techniques used are focused primarily on manipulating the moisture within clouds rather than the larger atmospheric dynamics that govern wind movement.
Question 5)
Doesn’t precipitation cause temperature gradients?
ChatGPT said:
Yes, precipitation can influence temperature gradients, but the effect depends on several factors, such as the type of precipitation, the environment, and the conditions surrounding it. Here's how it works:
1. Latent Heat Release
When precipitation occurs, particularly in the form of rain or snow, it is often associated with changes in temperature due to a process called latent heat release. This occurs when water vapor condenses into liquid or solid forms (like rain or snow), releasing energy in the process.
In clouds: As moisture in the air condenses and forms clouds, latent heat is released. This heat warms the surrounding air, which can create temperature gradients. In certain conditions, this can affect local weather patterns and might lead to changes in air pressure and wind.
During rain: When rain falls, it can cause the air near the surface to cool if the rain is cold (e.g., during a thunderstorm or winter precipitation), or it can warm the air if the rain falls through warmer layers of air.
2. Surface Cooling or Heating
Precipitation can affect the temperature of the Earth's surface, which in turn can influence temperature gradients. Here's how:
Rain: Rain can cool the surface as it evaporates before it reaches the ground (evaporative cooling) or directly upon contact with the surface. This cooling can create a temperature difference between the wet, cooler surface and the surrounding areas, especially if there is a significant difference in the amount of rainfall between locations.
Snow: Snowfall can have a similar effect, cooling the surface more intensely and potentially creating temperature contrasts between snow-covered and non-snow-covered areas.
3. Formation of Temperature Gradients
Precipitation can contribute to the formation or enhancement of temperature gradients, particularly when:
Storms occur: For example, during thunderstorms or tropical storms, where intense rainfall is accompanied by strong temperature contrasts between the warm, moist air at lower levels and cooler air aloft. This temperature difference can enhance convection, causing strong winds, gusts, and often leading to more severe weather conditions like thunderstorms.
Cold fronts: When a cold front moves through, it can bring cooler, denser air that clashes with warmer air ahead of it, often triggering precipitation such as rain or snow. The precipitation associated with the front can enhance or exacerbate the existing temperature gradients, particularly when the cold air from the front undercuts the warmer air ahead of it, leading to rapid temperature changes.
4. Localized Temperature Gradients
In certain regions, such as coastal or mountainous areas, precipitation can create localized temperature gradients. For example, when rain falls in a valley, it may cause the air temperature to drop significantly in that area, while the surrounding higher elevations may remain warmer or cooler due to different weather conditions.
Conclusion
While precipitation itself doesn’t directly "cause" temperature gradients in the large-scale sense, it can influence them by releasing latent heat, changing surface temperatures, and interacting with air masses. These factors can enhance or modify existing temperature gradients, especially in areas where precipitation is heavy or associated with significant weather events like thunderstorms or fronts.
Question 6)
By cloud seeding, can you affect the natural pattern of rainfall in a region enhancing rainfall in one area while depriving other areas of rainfall that may have occurred by the moisture prematurely being released by the cloud seeding?
ChatGPT said:
Yes, cloud seeding can potentially affect the natural pattern of rainfall in a region, both by enhancing rainfall in certain areas and, in some cases, reducing it in other areas. This happens due to the way cloud seeding works, by introducing substances into clouds to promote precipitation. Here's how:
1. Localized Enhancement of Rainfall
Cloud seeding typically focuses on increasing precipitation in a specific area where conditions are favorable. When cloud seeding is successful, it can enhance rainfall in the target area. This can be useful for water resource management in drought-prone regions, like California, where additional rainfall might be directed to specific watersheds or agricultural areas.
Effect on Targeted Area: The substances (such as silver iodide) released into the clouds can cause them to release moisture more quickly than they would naturally, potentially increasing the rainfall in a localized area. This could provide additional water to a region in need of precipitation, especially during dry periods.
2. Potential Impact on Other Areas
While cloud seeding can enhance rainfall in the targeted area, it could have unintended consequences on other areas, particularly those downstream or downwind of the seeding location. The process could lead to premature precipitation, which might not have occurred if the cloud had been allowed to develop naturally.
Depleting Moisture: If cloud seeding causes a cloud to release its moisture too soon, there might be less moisture available for downstream areas that would have otherwise received rainfall if the cloud had continued to develop. Essentially, seeding might "use up" the cloud’s moisture prematurely, potentially reducing rainfall in areas further along the cloud's path.
Shifting Rainfall Patterns: In some cases, cloud seeding might shift the rainfall pattern, increasing precipitation in one area while decreasing it in another. This effect is complex and depends on a number of variables, including wind patterns, cloud dynamics, and the timing and scale of the seeding operation.
3. Potential for Disruption of Natural Weather Patterns
The effect of cloud seeding on regional weather patterns is still a topic of research. While cloud seeding is designed to enhance precipitation, it could disrupt the natural distribution of rain, especially if it leads to localized changes in atmospheric pressure or moisture distribution. These changes could alter the natural movement of air masses and potentially affect rainfall in neighboring regions.
However, most cloud seeding programs are designed with this in mind, and efforts are typically made to minimize unintended consequences by carefully selecting the timing, location, and conditions under which seeding occurs. For instance, seeding is usually performed when the weather conditions are right to encourage precipitation without overly disrupting the natural dynamics of the weather system.
4. Challenges and Uncertainty
One of the main challenges of cloud seeding is predicting its exact effects. The science of cloud seeding is not yet precise enough to guarantee a specific outcome, and results can vary depending on a range of factors. In some cases, seeding might lead to little to no additional rainfall, or it might cause the clouds to release rain in an unexpected way, leading to localized disruptions in the expected rainfall patterns.
Conclusion
Yes, cloud seeding can affect the natural rainfall pattern in a region, potentially enhancing rainfall in a specific area while depriving other areas of rainfall. This happens because seeding accelerates the release of moisture in clouds, potentially reducing the amount of moisture available for other areas. The complexity of weather systems means that the effects of cloud seeding are difficult to predict with complete certainty, and unintended consequences are always a possibility. However, modern cloud seeding programs typically aim to minimize such risks through careful planning and monitoring.
Question 7)
Could one effect of cloud seeding be to enhance rainfall for commercial operations while reducing rainfall in non-commercial areas significantly increasing the risk of fire for the regions deprived of the rainfall?
ChatGPT said:
Yes, it's theoretically possible that cloud seeding could enhance rainfall in areas that benefit commercial operations, while potentially reducing rainfall in nearby regions, thus increasing the risk of fire in those deprived areas. This scenario depends on several factors, including how the cloud seeding is conducted, the natural weather conditions, and the geographical characteristics of the region. Here's how this could unfold:
1. Enhancing Rainfall for Commercial Operations
Cloud seeding can be used to increase precipitation in targeted areas, which could be beneficial for commercial operations, such as agriculture, water reservoirs, or forestry. In regions where water scarcity is a concern, cloud seeding could boost rainfall in specific locations, helping commercial sectors secure the water they need for irrigation, crop growth, or industrial purposes.
Agriculture: Farmers may benefit from increased rainfall due to cloud seeding, helping crops in arid areas or during dry periods.
Water Resource Management: Water authorities may use cloud seeding to increase water storage in reservoirs that supply water to large populations or commercial operations, like cities or industries.
2. Decreasing Rainfall in Non-Commercial Areas
As mentioned earlier, cloud seeding works by introducing substances like silver iodide or sodium chloride into clouds, causing them to release moisture more quickly than they would naturally. If seeding causes clouds to release moisture prematurely or unevenly, it could reduce the amount of rainfall in nearby areas that would have received rain if the cloud had been left to develop naturally.
Depriving Areas of Rain: In regions downwind or downstream of the seeded clouds, there may be significantly less rainfall than would have occurred without the intervention. If these areas are not receiving the additional precipitation, they could experience drier conditions than normal, leading to a higher risk of drought and wildfire.
3. Increased Fire Risk
The lack of rainfall in certain areas, especially during dry seasons, could increase the risk of wildfires. When areas are deprived of natural precipitation due to cloud seeding, vegetation may become drier and more susceptible to ignition. This is especially concerning in regions that are already prone to wildfires, such as California, where the combination of hot, dry conditions and strong winds can turn even small fires into catastrophic events.
Vegetation Drying Out: Areas that are deprived of rainfall could experience more dry vegetation, which is highly flammable and provides fuel for wildfires. The lack of rain would exacerbate these conditions, making it easier for wildfires to start and spread.
Potential for a Fire-Weather Cycle: In some cases, the disruption of natural rainfall patterns could contribute to a feedback loop, where areas that are already dry due to insufficient rainfall become even more susceptible to wildfires, which in turn worsen the overall drought conditions.
4. Ethical and Environmental Concerns
If cloud seeding were to significantly alter the natural distribution of rainfall, benefiting commercial operations at the expense of surrounding areas, it could raise ethical and environmental concerns. For example:
Water Allocation: If cloud seeding is used primarily to benefit commercial interests, such as large agricultural operations, and deprives nearby ecosystems or communities of necessary rainfall, it could lead to imbalances in water distribution, potentially harming non-commercial areas and ecosystems that depend on consistent rainfall.
Wildfire Impact: In fire-prone areas, the consequences of depriving regions of rainfall could be severe, not only increasing the risk of wildfires but also putting pressure on emergency response systems and resources needed to combat fires.
5. Controlling for Unintended Consequences
To minimize unintended consequences like this, cloud seeding programs are typically carefully planned and monitored. They aim to ensure that the seeding is done in a way that maximizes the benefits (e.g., increasing rainfall in areas that need it) while minimizing negative effects on nearby regions. However, the complexity of weather systems makes it difficult to perfectly predict the full impact of cloud seeding, and unintended consequences like these could still arise.
Conclusion
In theory, cloud seeding could enhance rainfall in targeted commercial areas while depriving nearby regions of rainfall, which could increase the risk of wildfires in the areas that are deprived of precipitation. The altered rainfall patterns could lead to drier conditions, making vegetation more susceptible to ignition. This could be a significant concern in areas prone to wildfires, such as California. Careful planning, monitoring, and management are essential to minimize such risks, but the potential for unintended consequences remains.
Question 8)
Who is in charge of carefully planning and monitoring all cloud seeding operations in California in a coordinated way that covers all the separate entities engaged in cloud seeding and what studies has the single entity in charge of carefully planning and monitoring all cloud seeding operations done to assess their impact on wild fires by virtue of depriving non-commercial benefactors of cloud seeding of rainfall and moisture in the air?
ChatGPT said:
In California, there is no single entity that fully coordinates and oversees all cloud seeding operations across the state. Instead, several different governmental agencies, local water districts, private companies, and even municipalities are involved in cloud seeding activities. However, some entities play a larger role in overseeing cloud seeding programs and coordinating them to some extent.
Key Entities Involved in Cloud Seeding in California:
California Department of Water Resources (DWR): The DWR is a key governmental agency involved in managing water resources in California. While they are not directly in charge of all cloud seeding operations, they are involved in some of the state’s most important water management projects. The DWR has funded and facilitated cloud seeding operations in the past, particularly as a part of efforts to enhance snowpack and water supply in areas affected by drought. Their role is more focused on increasing water storage in reservoirs, particularly in regions like the Sierra Nevada.
California Energy Commission (CEC): The CEC is another state agency that has shown interest in weather modification as a potential strategy to address droughts and water shortages, though their role is generally more focused on energy and environmental concerns. They may be involved in funding or regulating certain cloud seeding operations that have energy implications.
Local Water Districts: Numerous local water districts, such as the San Joaquin Valley Water District or Lake Tahoe Basin Water Authority, have been involved in cloud seeding programs. These districts often initiate and manage seeding operations on a local level, especially for the purposes of water supply augmentation. Some of these water districts may operate independently of state oversight.
Private Contractors: Several private companies conduct cloud seeding operations in California under contracts with local authorities or water districts. These companies are typically responsible for the actual execution of seeding projects, using aircraft or ground-based generators to disperse seeding agents into clouds.
Coordination and Monitoring:
While multiple entities engage in cloud seeding across California, there is no centralized, statewide body that strictly oversees and coordinates all these operations in a single, unified manner. However, some level of coordination does occur through:
State Water Plan (California Water Plan): This plan provides guidelines for water management, including weather modification activities. While not a comprehensive regulatory body specifically for cloud seeding, it does include provisions that touch on weather modification, including cloud seeding.
Interagency Collaboration: Agencies such as the DWR, CEC, and local water districts may collaborate to share data on weather modification activities. However, this collaboration is more focused on water augmentation goals and not necessarily on the long-term environmental or unintended consequences like the impact on wildfire risks.
Federal Weather Modification Programs: The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has a Weather Modification Program, which provides research and guidance on weather modification activities. While this program doesn’t directly regulate cloud seeding in California, it offers standards and research on the environmental impacts of such activities.
Research on Environmental Impacts:
As for the specific research related to cloud seeding’s potential impact on wildfires due to altered rainfall patterns, there is limited direct research focused on this issue. Most cloud seeding studies focus on its efficacy in enhancing precipitation for water resources, rather than its indirect effects like wildfire risks. However, some relevant points include:
Efficacy and Impact Studies:
Some studies conducted by entities like the University of California and Colorado State University have assessed the overall impact of cloud seeding on regional weather, including changes in precipitation and water supply. These studies focus on whether cloud seeding actually increases rainfall, as well as how effective it is in different types of clouds and weather conditions.
The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and other research institutions have also conducted studies on the broader impacts of cloud seeding, but they do not specifically focus on wildfire risk or its effects on non-commercial areas deprived of rainfall.
Wildfire and Precipitation Studies:
There are studies that link precipitation patterns to wildfire risks, particularly in areas that experience dry spells after cloud seeding operations. However, these studies are usually not done specifically in the context of cloud seeding but focus on natural variations in precipitation and their role in wildfire susceptibility.
Research generally shows that decreased rainfall, especially during dry seasons, can lead to increased fire risk by drying out vegetation, but specific studies on the impact of cloud seeding on this are sparse.
Conclusion:
In California, no single agency is fully responsible for the coordinated planning and monitoring of all cloud seeding operations. Several entities are involved, including the California Department of Water Resources, local water districts, and private contractors. While some studies have assessed the effectiveness of cloud seeding in enhancing rainfall for water resources, limited research has been conducted specifically on the potential impact of cloud seeding on wildfire risks due to deprived rainfall in non-commercial areas. Given the complexities of weather systems, the environmental impacts of cloud seeding, including its effects on wildfire risk, are not yet fully understood, and this area remains under-researched.
Question 9)
Who decides what areas need the rainfall and is ANY consideration given in this decision to the possible fire risks created by depriving regions that might otherwise have received the precipitation. If there is such a consideration, is it done with a prediction of where that precipitation would have occurred but for the cloud seeding?
ChatGPT said:
The decision on which areas need rainfall and whether fire risks are considered in cloud seeding operations is generally made by the entities that manage or fund the cloud seeding projects. These entities typically include local water districts, government agencies (such as the California Department of Water Resources or California Energy Commission), and sometimes private contractors. The decisions are largely based on the objective of improving water supplies or mitigating drought, but considerations regarding unintended consequences—such as wildfire risks—may not always be as thoroughly addressed.
Who Decides Which Areas Need Rainfall?
The decision on where cloud seeding should take place is usually made by the following parties:
Local Water Districts: Local water agencies or districts that are responsible for managing water resources often decide where cloud seeding should occur. Their primary goal is typically to increase water supplies for agricultural use, urban areas, or hydropower generation. They focus on areas that need additional moisture to enhance water storage in reservoirs or increase snowpack, especially during drought conditions.
State Agencies (e.g., California Department of Water Resources): State agencies may also play a role in determining where cloud seeding should take place, especially in larger watershed areas where regional water needs are considered. These agencies often make decisions based on broader water resource management goals, including balancing the needs of agriculture, urban areas, and the environment.
Private Contractors: In some cases, private companies contracted to perform cloud seeding might help advise on where to target seeding operations based on weather patterns, cloud conditions, and the needs of the contracting agency. They use forecasting models to predict which areas are most likely to benefit from seeding.
Consideration of Fire Risks in Cloud Seeding Decisions
While the primary goal of cloud seeding programs is to enhance precipitation in target areas, fire risk considerations are not always a primary focus in the decision-making process. In most cases, cloud seeding is performed to increase water supply or help manage drought, without a specific focus on the broader environmental impacts such as wildfire risks.
However, there are a few aspects where fire risk may indirectly be taken into account:
General Awareness of Wildfire Risk: In fire-prone regions (like California), decision-makers are generally aware of the risks posed by reduced rainfall in the summer and fall. If a cloud seeding operation is performed during the winter or early spring, there might be some awareness that depriving other areas of rainfall could lead to drier conditions later in the year, potentially contributing to wildfire risks. However, this consideration is typically not a primary factor in cloud seeding decisions.
Coordination with Local Authorities: In areas where cloud seeding is planned, especially in places that are known to be prone to wildfires, local authorities (such as fire departments) and environmental agencies might be consulted. If there are concerns about fire risks, these agencies could provide input on whether seeding should occur, based on their understanding of seasonal fire risk and moisture levels in the region.
Public and Environmental Concerns: In some cases, environmental organizations or public stakeholders may raise concerns about how cloud seeding could affect local ecosystems, including the risk of wildfires in drier areas. However, these concerns might not be fully addressed unless there is specific advocacy or regulation requiring such considerations.
Prediction of Precipitation and Impact on Non-Target Areas
Predicting exactly where precipitation would have fallen in the absence of cloud seeding is extremely difficult. Weather systems are complex and unpredictable, and cloud seeding can alter the behavior of clouds in ways that are hard to forecast with complete accuracy. However, there are a few general approaches to understanding and estimating these impacts:
Weather Models and Forecasting: Weather forecasting models can predict the likelihood of precipitation in different areas based on existing atmospheric conditions, but they are not typically able to pinpoint precisely where precipitation would have occurred but for the cloud seeding. These models do give scientists a sense of where cloud seeding might be most effective, but they do not predict with high accuracy how seeding might alter the natural distribution of rain.
Cloud Seeding Simulation Studies: Some studies attempt to model the effects of cloud seeding on rainfall distribution by simulating the behavior of seeded clouds and estimating how moisture would be redistributed. These models are still in development and have limitations, but they aim to understand the potential unintended consequences of cloud seeding, including how much moisture might be diverted away from unseeded areas.
Monitoring Post-Seeding: After cloud seeding operations, agencies or contractors may monitor the effects on local precipitation patterns to assess whether the seeding was successful. This might include checking whether rainfall was enhanced in the targeted area and whether nearby regions experienced a decrease in precipitation. However, even with post-seeding analysis, attributing a reduction in rainfall to cloud seeding can be challenging due to the complexity of atmospheric processes.
Conclusion
In California, the decision on where cloud seeding should take place is made by local water districts, state agencies, and private contractors, with the goal of increasing water supplies for human use or agricultural needs. While some awareness of wildfire risks may influence decision-making, fire risks resulting from depriving non-commercial areas of rainfall are not always a primary factor in cloud seeding decisions. There is limited prediction of exactly where precipitation would have fallen if the clouds had not been seeded, and such impacts on wildfire risk are not typically evaluated in detail before seeding operations.
As a result, cloud seeding operations may inadvertently contribute to drier conditions in areas that were deprived of rain, increasing fire risks in those regions. However, this is a complex issue, and further research and better coordination between agencies would be needed to fully assess and mitigate these unintended consequences.
Question 10)
Are there any financial incentives for any of the decision makers being Local Water Districts, State Agencies (e.g., California Department of Water Resources) and especially Private Contractors to refrain from cloud seeding in order to allow for rainfall in areas that need water to reduce the risk of wild fires?
ChatGPT said:
The financial incentives for decision-makers, including local water districts, state agencies (like the California Department of Water Resources), and private contractors, to refrain from cloud seeding in order to allow rainfall to reduce the risk of wildfires are generally not strong in a direct sense. The main financial motivations for cloud seeding operations typically revolve around enhancing water supply for human and agricultural use, which is often seen as a priority over other considerations such as wildfire risk. However, a number of factors could indirectly influence the decision to refrain from cloud seeding, even if wildfire risk is not always a primary consideration.
1. Local Water Districts and State Agencies:
Primary Financial Incentive:
The main financial incentive for local water districts and state agencies to engage in cloud seeding is the desire to augment water supplies—whether to increase snowpack, ensure water availability for agriculture, or replenish reservoirs. Water districts that serve large populations or agricultural industries have a direct economic incentive to boost precipitation, especially during drought conditions.
Financial Incentive to Refrain:
Fire Risk and Water Availability for Firefighting: In fire-prone areas like California, if decision-makers were aware of the potential wildfire risk due to cloud seeding causing drier conditions elsewhere, there might be some financial incentive to avoid cloud seeding. For example, if cloud seeding leads to more severe wildfires, the subsequent costs to emergency response, firefighting efforts, and potential property damage could outweigh the immediate financial benefits of additional water supply.
This type of indirect financial incentive to refrain from cloud seeding would likely come into play only if there was a clear understanding and evidence that cloud seeding directly contributes to increased fire risk and that the financial burden of fires (e.g., firefighting costs, insurance claims, economic loss) would be higher than the benefits of the extra water supply.
Public and Environmental Pressure: Public pressure and environmental advocacy could also serve as a deterrent. If cloud seeding operations were seen to significantly increase wildfire risks or cause ecological harm (such as drought in certain regions), local authorities might face backlash. This could result in reputational and financial costs in the long term, such as:
Legal action or regulatory constraints that might affect future cloud seeding projects.
Loss of public support for agencies or districts if they are seen to prioritize water supply over fire risk mitigation.
Water Use Restrictions: During periods of extreme drought, water districts might face water use restrictions or public pressure to use water resources more judiciously. In these cases, there might be financial consequences for using too much water or diverting too much water to cloud seeding operations, especially if the public perceives those actions as wasteful or misaligned with broader water conservation goals.
2. Private Contractors:
Primary Financial Incentive:
Profit from Cloud Seeding Services: Private contractors engaged in cloud seeding typically profit from the contracts they secure to perform these operations. Their main financial incentive is to maximize the amount of cloud seeding performed to generate income from these services.
They are often hired by local water districts, municipalities, or state agencies to carry out cloud seeding, and the more seeding they conduct, the higher their profits. For private companies, this is their business model, and they do not typically consider broader environmental impacts like wildfire risks unless it directly affects their contract or operations.
Incentive to Refrain:
Long-Term Reputation and Legal Liabilities: If a private contractor were to engage in cloud seeding that led to a significant wildfire or severe drought in non-commercial areas, it could result in legal liabilities, reputational damage, or financial penalties if it was found that the contractor did not adequately assess or mitigate the risks of their activities. Although rare, this type of financial incentive could potentially encourage contractors to consider wildfire risk in their operations, especially if insurance premiums or legal costs increase due to past incidents.
Regulatory Constraints: Contractors might be hesitant to conduct cloud seeding if they anticipate tighter regulatory oversight or public opposition, particularly if there is evidence that cloud seeding is increasing fire risk or depleting water resources in sensitive areas. The risk of regulatory backlash could affect a contractor's ability to secure future contracts, and this could serve as an indirect financial incentive to refrain from seeding in certain areas.
3. Coordination and Policy Impacts:
The financial incentives for refraining from cloud seeding to reduce wildfire risk are more likely to come from public policy and long-term environmental planning rather than individual financial incentives. For instance:
Risk Management: Agencies like the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) or local water districts might engage in careful risk management assessments if they realize that cloud seeding could increase wildfire risks. The cost of wildfire damage—including firefighting costs, economic loss, and ecological impact—could outweigh the benefits of cloud seeding in certain areas. However, this kind of decision-making often requires a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach that considers both water resources and fire risks.
Climate and Weather Pattern Considerations: If future studies and modeling show that cloud seeding in certain areas consistently leads to unintended consequences, such as increasing wildfire risk, policymakers may enact regulations that limit or alter cloud seeding practices. These regulatory actions could come with financial incentives or penalties depending on the decisions made.
4. Direct and Indirect Consequences:
While direct financial incentives for refraining from cloud seeding to reduce wildfire risk are not prominent, the indirect consequences—including fire suppression costs, insurance liabilities, and regulatory scrutiny—could gradually increase awareness of the risks and motivate a reevaluation of cloud seeding practices.
In Summary:
The financial incentives for decision-makers (local water districts, state agencies, and private contractors) to refrain from cloud seeding specifically to reduce wildfire risk are not strong in a direct, immediate financial sense. The primary financial motivation for cloud seeding is to enhance water supply, especially during drought conditions. However, indirect financial incentives—such as potential legal liabilities, firefighting costs, public backlash, and regulatory risks—could influence decisions if the long-term environmental and financial consequences of cloud seeding, such as increased wildfire risk, become more apparent.
Ultimately, a more robust policy framework and interdisciplinary research would be needed to better align cloud seeding efforts with wildfire prevention goals, ensuring that these operations are more carefully considered within the context of broader environmental and economic risks.
Question 11)
Since you have stated that
1) cloud seeding has been conducted in California since the 1950s
2) seeding accelerates the release of moisture in clouds, potentially reducing the amount of moisture available for other areas
3) There is no coordinated approach to when and who cloud seeds
4) There is limited research (if any) conducted specifically on the potential impact of cloud seeding on wildfire risks due to deprived rainfall in non-commercial areas.
5) There is no way to accurately determine what areas would have received precipitation but for the cloud seeding operation
6) There is no direct financial incentives in place to consider the impact on wildfires by those conducting cloud seeding on a regular basis
7) The primary Financial Incentive for private contractors (at the moment) is to maximize the amount of cloud seeding performed to generate income from these services
In a one word answer, is it fair to say that with respect to Wild Fires, the ongoing use of Cloud Seeding in California, a region known for its potential for Wild Fires, is "Playing with Fire"?
ChatGPT said:
Yes.
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
Easily share with this link: https://tribeqr.com/v/realclimatechange
Twitter Share Link : https://x.com/tniwef/status/1877474986622915028
Disclaimer: All content is presented for educational and/or entertainment purposes only. Under no circumstances should it be mistaken for professional advice, nor is it at all intended to be taken as such. The contents simply reflect current newsworthy items on Covid and other Big Company and Government Regulatory Authority activity that are freely available. It is subject to error and change without notice. The presence of a link to a website does not indicate approval or endorsement of that web site or any services, products, or opinions that may be offered by them.
Neither this Substack nor any of its principals or contributors are under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein.
Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.
Disclosure: We accept no advertising or compensation, and have no material connection to any products, brands, topics or companies mentioned anywhere on this post.
Fair Use Notice: This post may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This post is making such material available in efforts to advance understanding of issues of social significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
🌽sider, China Virus 2.0 is a respiratory virus. We know that the Co Vi D jabs reduced immune systems immunity to respiratory infections. The spike protein FauXi bioweapons act like asbestos and graphene oxide to attack lungs. And the majority of masks from China have graphene oxide. GooberNator Gruesome gave China $1 Billion for masks never delivered. China just cut communications cables to Taiwan. 🧐
And now WildFire COPD, like post 9-11 in Manhattan.
Just woke up here in Japan, intending on starting a rather short but rare (for me) post regarding the LA fires, inspired by podcasters "Brush Junke" ... when I came across this. Will have to make a cup of coffee and give it a good read. Excellent prompting and use of 4.o. Will add something in my own post referring to this.
Cheers and looking forward to the read.