The obvious results of uncontrolled biodistribution of Synthetic man-made Genetic instructions; the Data , the Science, the Common Sense and the inevitable awakening is coming for those responsible.
There is a cartel of Academic Journal that are likely protecting the mRNA industry.
The only studies that make it into this cartel of Journals appear to be the ones that praise mRNA vaccines, suggest the issues are "rare" or deal with what people might consider not important like a loss of a little bit of hair or a wart.
I suggest the Journals are relatively comfortable with this one as there is no access to the Data - except to specifically write in and request it and it does not deal with the deadly side of mRNA.
Nevertheless the mRNA Fly Spray effect for less serious adverse reaction support the obvious;
Uncontrolled Bio Distribution of impure/synthetic instructions to produce a pathogen (or part thereof) is inviting uncontrolled distribution of Autoimmune related disorders throughout the body. This finding is reflected in the record serious adverse reaction and death reports for mRNA vaccines and the sustained excess deaths in Countries that adopted the mRNA Medical Pandora box biotechnology.
You mention a very important point; this study did not risk stratify (and it also removed those with underlying health issues), highlighting that the effects they observe would be across all age groups without comorbidities.
This highlights what an utter disaster an mRNA vaccine could be as a technology and an idea for a "Vaccine" that could only ever possibly help an aged and co-morbidity stratified population; and only then if those groups were kept in the dark or prohibited from safe and effective peer reviewed multi-drug early treatment guides as can easily be obtained here:
What a strange study! It focused on non-serious Adverse Events and was nut stratified by age. It is as if they knew it would be publishable because it still fits the vaccine agenda. Look - nothing too bad to see here. The same methodology with slight tweaks applied to serious Adverse Events by birth years in small brackets (2 years being the best, 5 years still being helpful) could really advance the conversation especially if it covered Jan 1, 2021 to December 31, 2024.
There is a cartel of Academic Journal that are likely protecting the mRNA industry.
The only studies that make it into this cartel of Journals appear to be the ones that praise mRNA vaccines, suggest the issues are "rare" or deal with what people might consider not important like a loss of a little bit of hair or a wart.
I suggest the Journals are relatively comfortable with this one as there is no access to the Data - except to specifically write in and request it and it does not deal with the deadly side of mRNA.
Nevertheless the mRNA Fly Spray effect for less serious adverse reaction support the obvious;
Uncontrolled Bio Distribution of impure/synthetic instructions to produce a pathogen (or part thereof) is inviting uncontrolled distribution of Autoimmune related disorders throughout the body. This finding is reflected in the record serious adverse reaction and death reports for mRNA vaccines and the sustained excess deaths in Countries that adopted the mRNA Medical Pandora box biotechnology.
You mention a very important point; this study did not risk stratify (and it also removed those with underlying health issues), highlighting that the effects they observe would be across all age groups without comorbidities.
This highlights what an utter disaster an mRNA vaccine could be as a technology and an idea for a "Vaccine" that could only ever possibly help an aged and co-morbidity stratified population; and only then if those groups were kept in the dark or prohibited from safe and effective peer reviewed multi-drug early treatment guides as can easily be obtained here:
https://aapsonline.org/covidpatientguide/
with similar protocols found here
https://covid19.onedaymd.com/2022/07/flccc-i-care-covid-treatment-protocol.html
What a strange study! It focused on non-serious Adverse Events and was nut stratified by age. It is as if they knew it would be publishable because it still fits the vaccine agenda. Look - nothing too bad to see here. The same methodology with slight tweaks applied to serious Adverse Events by birth years in small brackets (2 years being the best, 5 years still being helpful) could really advance the conversation especially if it covered Jan 1, 2021 to December 31, 2024.
Hope so!! It can’t come fast enough!!