Proof of a mRNA Disaster! A Buried England mRNA Data Avalanche has been Exposed. We can now Compare the % of All Cause Death (by Vaccination Status) with the % of Vaccine Uptake.
Proof of a mRNA Disaster! A Buried England mRNA Data Avalanche has been Exposed. We can now Compare the % of All Cause Death (by Vaccination Status) with the % of Vaccine Uptake.
Any Religious Body, Health Authority , Health Worker, Politician, Pharmacy Executive, Statistician, Judge or any Adult for that matter now has a Duty to Protect their communities from mRNA.
I hope RFKenndy, Jr. is reviewing these studies and all studies related to the jab, and then compiles them in an "Idiot's Guide" of sorts. His impeccably researched book about Fauci opened eyes and saved lives and as the immoral push for jabs continues, this sort of book would do the same. In the meantime, Jessica Rose, my sincerest gratitude for your work.
Great article!! I have the utmost respect for you and all your amazing telling of the truth , I share all of your articles on all platforms I have access to you. Thank you for all your amazing work .
By getting one or two of these charts into a public place who knows how quickly the awareness bubble will grow; with each new member comes pressure on the Globalists
You talk about the mRNA vaccines but don't forget the UK used the adenovirus DNA vaccine for the older people or does the data in some way differentiate the type of vaccine used?
In the post you have access to the source files of the Data
There are two sources
Data source 1
The UK's ONS which provides the All Cause by Vaccination Status Statistics in England for 18+ broken up to age groups of 18-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69,70-79, 80-89 and 90+
Data Source 2 (Super buried "public domain" source and what has enabled the charts)
The UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Uptake Data of England
broken up to age groups that sadly include (5-11, 12-15,16-17) and the relevant age groups to match to the ONS data of 18-19,20-24,25-29,30-34,35-49,40-44, 45-49, 40-49, 50-59, 60-64,65-69,70-74,75-79 and 80+
Two Substacks so far have been produced
This one which looks at all groups 18+ (Where we find your query)
And a following Substack which dives into the youngest ONS group 18-39 to address exactly what you raise "Since the vaccine uptake is higher in older age groups while these groups are also more prone to illness, there may be an unwanted skewing effect due to poor sample matching."
Note: There are some Vaccine Merchant Friendly Statisticians that would like to muddy the waters of this highly dangerous all-cause deaths product outcome; attempting to suggest what we are seeing is not what we are seeing and there is some kind of Paradox (Example Simpson's paradox is a phenomenon in probability and statistics in which a trend appears in several groups of data but disappears or reverses when the groups are combined).
Back on point:
The second Substack focus on 18-39 revealed
a) This close to 40% of the 18+ population contributed under 0.5% to the all-cause mortality
So ANY different trend we "might" see here would have a tiny impact to this highly dangerous all-cause deaths product outcome.
b) The highly dangerous all-cause deaths product outcome was indeed mirrored in this tiny and youngest subset of all-cause death by vaccine status
i) THE SAME disproportional representation of all-cause deaths in the Vaccinated
ii)The Vaccinated representation of all-cause deaths increases with vaccine status doses.
The exposed England data we have charted can allows for the isolation of narrow age groups
40-49, 50-59, 60-69,70-79, 80-89 or 90+
The Hypothesis is Common Sense ; take so many risks in so many unchartered waters with the population wide use of impure genetic instructions of a synthetic nature having an undefined duration of action and having an uncontrolled highly inflammatory Lipid Nano Particle biodistribution profile is going to lead to complications in health outcomes and death as we are now seeing in England Data, on our own doorsteps, in Hospitals, Mortuaries and the newly biggest category of cause of death "unknown"
Its a very good idea to be very careful not to dismiss clear Danger as in doing so you could be encouraging people into thinking something is safe when it is not. And there are so many out there that would prefer to think what they have done is perfectly safe....
The data sources are open and transparent.
The workings are also provided.
The graphs are indeed telling you exactly what you needed for proof
Look at the three dose third graph and understand that the Y axis (Vertical axis) is Percent
The very top graph line is "Percentage of All cause Deaths 18+ with THREE or More Doses Vaccine Status"
Where the data ends that percentage (of the total all-cause deaths in the 18+ Cohort) by this Vaccine Status group is 91.5%
However those with Three or more doses Vaccine Status represents only 65% of the population of the 18+ Cohort
To be clear the cohort consist of 18+ living in England
So Clearly the Deaths representation for this vaccine status group is TERRIBLY OVER REPRESENTED
Now look at the Bottom Lines of the same graph
The very bottom line is "Percentage of all cause Deaths 18+ UNVACCINATED Status"
Where the data ends that percentage (of the total all-cause deaths in the 18+ Cohort) by the UNVACCINATED is 3.3%
However those with UNVACCINATED Status represents 18.5% of the population of the 18+ Cohort
Again, To be clear the cohort consist of 18+ living in England
So Clearly the Deaths representation for this UNVACCINATED group is UNDER REPRESENTED which highlights even further that the Vaccinations are doing significant harm
Note: There are some Vaccine Merchant Friendly Statisticians that would like to muddy the waters of this highly dangerous all-cause deaths product outcome; attempting to suggest what we are seeing is not what we are seeing and there is some kind of Paradox (Example Simpson's paradox is a phenomenon in probability and statistics in which a trend appears in several groups of data but disappears or reverses when the groups are combined).
And a following Substack which dives into the youngest ONS group 18-39 to address exactly this attempt to muddy the waters
a) This close to 40% of the 18+ population contributed under 0.5% to the all-cause mortality
So ANY different trend we "might" see here would have a tiny impact to this highly dangerous all-cause deaths product outcome.
b) The highly dangerous all-cause deaths product outcome was indeed mirrored in this tiny and youngest subset of all-cause death by vaccine status
i) THE SAME disproportional representation of all-cause deaths in the Vaccinated
ii)The Vaccinated representation of all-cause deaths increases with vaccine status doses.
The Hypothesis is Common Sense ; take so many risks in so many unchartered waters with the population wide use of impure genetic instructions of a synthetic nature having an undefined duration of action and having an uncontrolled highly inflammatory Lipid Nano Particle biodistribution profile is going to lead to complications in health outcomes and death as we are now seeing in England Data, on our own doorsteps, in Hospitals, Mortuaries and the newly biggest category of cause of death "unknown"
A brilliant though devastating analyses. God only knows how the future will pan out for the unfortunate jabbed people of the world. I find myself overwhelmed by the cruelty of the situation. How do those responsible sleep at night, it’s beyond me. Thank you for your hard work and diligence.
Oh Deary me!... now the cats out the bag...you cannot unring the warning bell... so get ready for lots and lots of feeble excuses... we shall never forget ... nor should we.
And PharmCorp will point the finger back at our elected leaders and Departments of Defense and Regulatory Agencies and say, look at them, this was entirely their fault. You did this to yourselves!
And we will look at all the paper trails (and Subtacks) and concur and continue to sedate our ourselves and relinquish our individual liberty. GloboCap for the Win! Hope I can adapt to being Borg as the uniqueness of my conscious awareness is sucked dry by the market. OR: I could sober up. Learn to say No. Not Obey. Be a different kind of human. That sounds like more fun.
A year ago the ONS DATA showed almost a factor of 2 increase in All-Cause-Mortality for the Vax'd compared to the Un-Vaxed:
https://timellison.substack.com/p/follow-up-2-on-i-hope-there-is-nothing
I'm glad to see that after 1 year the new DATA still show the same thing ...
I am so grateful for your stack. Thank you.
I hope RFKenndy, Jr. is reviewing these studies and all studies related to the jab, and then compiles them in an "Idiot's Guide" of sorts. His impeccably researched book about Fauci opened eyes and saved lives and as the immoral push for jabs continues, this sort of book would do the same. In the meantime, Jessica Rose, my sincerest gratitude for your work.
Great article!! I have the utmost respect for you and all your amazing telling of the truth , I share all of your articles on all platforms I have access to you. Thank you for all your amazing work .
Not an accident
We are caged in an internet bubble which we can expand by inviting people outside of the bubble to scan there way in:
At the bottom of each post are the charts in a PDF format ; meant for printing out and displaying in public places (With permission)
The graphs also have a QR code pointing back to the SUBSTACKs you have read
You can directly download the Graphs from these two links:
http://tribeqr.com/v/18to39dosingdeathcharts
and
http://tribeqr.com/v/18andoverdosingdeathcharts
By getting one or two of these charts into a public place who knows how quickly the awareness bubble will grow; with each new member comes pressure on the Globalists
I showed this to a friend who has asked (sincerely) if this can be explained by more older people being vaccinated.
I’m not a statistician: could anyone please give me an answer to give him? Thanks!
Pureblood and proud 👍
Uh-oh (for Big Pharma and their bought & paid for lackeys in government).
Millions are about to get red-pilled.
This could get ugly.
You talk about the mRNA vaccines but don't forget the UK used the adenovirus DNA vaccine for the older people or does the data in some way differentiate the type of vaccine used?
Thank you for your genuine inquiry.
In the post you have access to the source files of the Data
There are two sources
Data source 1
The UK's ONS which provides the All Cause by Vaccination Status Statistics in England for 18+ broken up to age groups of 18-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69,70-79, 80-89 and 90+
Data Source 2 (Super buried "public domain" source and what has enabled the charts)
The UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Uptake Data of England
broken up to age groups that sadly include (5-11, 12-15,16-17) and the relevant age groups to match to the ONS data of 18-19,20-24,25-29,30-34,35-49,40-44, 45-49, 40-49, 50-59, 60-64,65-69,70-74,75-79 and 80+
Two Substacks so far have been produced
This one which looks at all groups 18+ (Where we find your query)
And a following Substack which dives into the youngest ONS group 18-39 to address exactly what you raise "Since the vaccine uptake is higher in older age groups while these groups are also more prone to illness, there may be an unwanted skewing effect due to poor sample matching."
https://thenobodywhoknowseverybody.substack.com/p/further-proof-the-age-adjusted-argument
Note: There are some Vaccine Merchant Friendly Statisticians that would like to muddy the waters of this highly dangerous all-cause deaths product outcome; attempting to suggest what we are seeing is not what we are seeing and there is some kind of Paradox (Example Simpson's paradox is a phenomenon in probability and statistics in which a trend appears in several groups of data but disappears or reverses when the groups are combined).
Back on point:
The second Substack focus on 18-39 revealed
a) This close to 40% of the 18+ population contributed under 0.5% to the all-cause mortality
So ANY different trend we "might" see here would have a tiny impact to this highly dangerous all-cause deaths product outcome.
b) The highly dangerous all-cause deaths product outcome was indeed mirrored in this tiny and youngest subset of all-cause death by vaccine status
i) THE SAME disproportional representation of all-cause deaths in the Vaccinated
ii)The Vaccinated representation of all-cause deaths increases with vaccine status doses.
The exposed England data we have charted can allows for the isolation of narrow age groups
40-49, 50-59, 60-69,70-79, 80-89 or 90+
The Hypothesis is Common Sense ; take so many risks in so many unchartered waters with the population wide use of impure genetic instructions of a synthetic nature having an undefined duration of action and having an uncontrolled highly inflammatory Lipid Nano Particle biodistribution profile is going to lead to complications in health outcomes and death as we are now seeing in England Data, on our own doorsteps, in Hospitals, Mortuaries and the newly biggest category of cause of death "unknown"
Its a very good idea to be very careful not to dismiss clear Danger as in doing so you could be encouraging people into thinking something is safe when it is not. And there are so many out there that would prefer to think what they have done is perfectly safe....
The data sources are open and transparent.
The workings are also provided.
The graphs are indeed telling you exactly what you needed for proof
Look at the three dose third graph and understand that the Y axis (Vertical axis) is Percent
The very top graph line is "Percentage of All cause Deaths 18+ with THREE or More Doses Vaccine Status"
Where the data ends that percentage (of the total all-cause deaths in the 18+ Cohort) by this Vaccine Status group is 91.5%
However those with Three or more doses Vaccine Status represents only 65% of the population of the 18+ Cohort
To be clear the cohort consist of 18+ living in England
So Clearly the Deaths representation for this vaccine status group is TERRIBLY OVER REPRESENTED
Now look at the Bottom Lines of the same graph
The very bottom line is "Percentage of all cause Deaths 18+ UNVACCINATED Status"
Where the data ends that percentage (of the total all-cause deaths in the 18+ Cohort) by the UNVACCINATED is 3.3%
However those with UNVACCINATED Status represents 18.5% of the population of the 18+ Cohort
Again, To be clear the cohort consist of 18+ living in England
So Clearly the Deaths representation for this UNVACCINATED group is UNDER REPRESENTED which highlights even further that the Vaccinations are doing significant harm
Note: There are some Vaccine Merchant Friendly Statisticians that would like to muddy the waters of this highly dangerous all-cause deaths product outcome; attempting to suggest what we are seeing is not what we are seeing and there is some kind of Paradox (Example Simpson's paradox is a phenomenon in probability and statistics in which a trend appears in several groups of data but disappears or reverses when the groups are combined).
And a following Substack which dives into the youngest ONS group 18-39 to address exactly this attempt to muddy the waters
https://thenobodywhoknowseverybody.substack.com/p/further-proof-the-age-adjusted-argument
The second Substack focus on 18-39 revealed
a) This close to 40% of the 18+ population contributed under 0.5% to the all-cause mortality
So ANY different trend we "might" see here would have a tiny impact to this highly dangerous all-cause deaths product outcome.
b) The highly dangerous all-cause deaths product outcome was indeed mirrored in this tiny and youngest subset of all-cause death by vaccine status
i) THE SAME disproportional representation of all-cause deaths in the Vaccinated
ii)The Vaccinated representation of all-cause deaths increases with vaccine status doses.
The Hypothesis is Common Sense ; take so many risks in so many unchartered waters with the population wide use of impure genetic instructions of a synthetic nature having an undefined duration of action and having an uncontrolled highly inflammatory Lipid Nano Particle biodistribution profile is going to lead to complications in health outcomes and death as we are now seeing in England Data, on our own doorsteps, in Hospitals, Mortuaries and the newly biggest category of cause of death "unknown"
A brilliant though devastating analyses. God only knows how the future will pan out for the unfortunate jabbed people of the world. I find myself overwhelmed by the cruelty of the situation. How do those responsible sleep at night, it’s beyond me. Thank you for your hard work and diligence.
Oh Deary me!... now the cats out the bag...you cannot unring the warning bell... so get ready for lots and lots of feeble excuses... we shall never forget ... nor should we.
I invite you to read and react to this substack: https://etana.substack.com/p/callthefda?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Ask the FDA yourself. Record, and post.
And PharmCorp will point the finger back at our elected leaders and Departments of Defense and Regulatory Agencies and say, look at them, this was entirely their fault. You did this to yourselves!
And we will look at all the paper trails (and Subtacks) and concur and continue to sedate our ourselves and relinquish our individual liberty. GloboCap for the Win! Hope I can adapt to being Borg as the uniqueness of my conscious awareness is sucked dry by the market. OR: I could sober up. Learn to say No. Not Obey. Be a different kind of human. That sounds like more fun.